Who Can Lie to a Robot? Roboethics and Categorical Imperative

Authors

  • Ignacio Quintanilla Navarro Comunidad de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revtechno.v3.1176

Keywords:

Roboethics, Deception, Artificial Intelligence, Objective Intelligence, Formal Ethics, Cathegorical Imperative, Empathy

Abstract

This  paper  analyzes  the  impact  of  our  new  technological  system  in  the  evolution  and  structure  of  our  ethical argumentation.Considering the possibility of the deception in the relationship human-robot, the paper discusses some of the implications  of  the  ethical  doctrines  of  Kant  and  Scheler  in  a  situation  of  human-robot  communication.  After  a  historical analysis of the relationship between technology and ethical argumentation the paper proposes an interpretation of the moral argument exposed by Kant in his essay “On a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns”, published in 1979, in the context of the interaction human being-robot. The final section offers some suggestions on general roboethics.

References

Anderson, S. L. (2008). “Asimov´s “three laws of robotics” and machine metaethics”. Journal AI & Society - Special Issue: Ethics and artificial agents archive , 22(49), 477-493.

Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition . Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Floreano, D., Mitri, S., Magnenat, S., Keller, L. (2007). “Evolutionary conditions for the emergence of communication in robots”. Current Biology 17(6), 514-9.

Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we Became Posthuman, virtual bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1990) [1817]. Enciclopedia de las ciencias filosóficas. Trad. Francisco Larroyo. México: Porrúa.

Kahn, P. H., et al. (2012). “Do people Hold a Humanoid Robot Morally Accountable for the Harm it Causes?”, Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction . ACM, Nueva York, 33-40.

Kang, M. (2011). Sublime Dreams of Living Machines: The Automaton in the European Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kant, I. (1956) [1785]. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres ). Wiesbaden: Suhrkamp.

Kant, I. (1797) “Sobre un presunto derecho de mentir por filantropía” (Trad. Juan Miguel Palacios). En Teoría y práctica. Madrid: Tecnos.

Lin, P., et al. (2012). Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics . Cambridge MA: MIT.

MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue . Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Mitcham, C. y Duval, R.S. (2000). Engineer’s Toolkit: Engineering Ethics . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Moon, A., et al. (2012). “Open Roboethics: Establishing an Online Community for Accelerated Policy and Design Change”, Proceedings of We Robot 2012 . Miami: Miami University Press.

Palacios, J.M. (2008). Bondad moral e inteligencia ética. Madrid: Encuentro.

Paton, H. J. (1971). The Categorical Imperative; a study in Kant's moral philosophy. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Popper, K. R. (1994) [1987]. Sociedad Abierta, universo abierto . Madrid: Tecnos.

Powers, T. M. (2011). “Prospects for a Kantian Machine”. Machine Ethics . En Anderson, M. y Anderson, S. (eds). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Quintanilla, I. (2006). “El cambio tecnológico: cuatro apuntes desde la filosofía”, Empresa y Humanismo, IX, 141-164.

Quintanilla, I. (2012). Techné. La filosofía y el sentido de la técnica. Madrid: Common Ground Publishing.

Scheler, M. (2004) [1923]. Esencia y formas de la simpatía . Trad. José Gaos. Buenos Aires: Losada.

Simon, H. A. (1968). The Sciences of the Artificial . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Veruggio, G. (2005). “The Birth of Roboethics”, IEEE- ICRA,Workshop on Roboethics, 1-4.

Veruggio G. y Operto F. (2010). “Ethical and societal guidelines for Robotics”. En Gerhard Dabringer (ed.), Ethical and Legal Aspects of Unmanned Systems. Viena: Austrian Ministry of Defence and Sports.

Wagner, A. R. y Atkin R. C. (2010). Robot deception: Recognizing when a Robot Should Deceive. Georgia: Georgia Institute of Technology.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-16

How to Cite

Quintanilla Navarro, I. (2014). Who Can Lie to a Robot? Roboethics and Categorical Imperative. TECHNO REVIEW. International Technology, Science and Society Review Revista Internacional De Tecnología, Ciencia Y Sociedad, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revtechno.v3.1176

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2014)

Section

Research articles

License

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
  2. After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
  3. In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org