Why do users accept the information technology? Description and use of theories and models of their acceptance

Autores

  • María García De Blanes Sebastián Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
  • Arta Artonovica Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
  • José Ramón Sarmiento Guede Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4366

Palavras-chave:

Technological acceptance models, Behavioral intention, Behavior of use, TAM, UTAUT 2, Web of Science, MAXQDA software

Resumo

The objective of this research is to understand, predict and explain what factors influence organizations and induce individuals to accept technology. Through the methodology of content analysis and based on the Web of Science database and through the MAXQDA software, this document analyzes and reviews the ten most important theories and models of technology acceptance used in recent years. This review offers a holistic view that will help future researchers to select the most appropriate theories to apply to their field of study.

Referências

Abela, J. A. (2002). Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: una revisión actualizada. Sevilla: Fundación Centro de Estudios Andaluces.

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer. Heidelber & Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. The Dorsey Press.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I., y Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.

Alexandre, B., Reynaud, E., Osiurak, F., y Navarro, J. (2018). Acceptance and acceptability criteria: a literature review. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20(2), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0459-1

Alomary, A., y Woollard, J. (2015). How is technology accepted by users? A review of technology acceptance models and theories. Proceedings of The IRES 17th International Conference, London, United Kingdom. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/382037/1/110-14486008271-4.pdf

Amsterdamska, O., y Leydesdorff, L. (1989). Citations: Indicators of significance? Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 449- 471. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017065

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs. Bardin, L. (1996.) Análisis de contenido. Akal.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., y Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Davis, F. D., y Warshaw, P. R. (1992). What do intention scales measure? The Journal of General Psychology, 119(4), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1992.9921181

Dillon, A., y Morris, M. G. (1996). User acceptance of information technology: Theories and models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 31, 3-32. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/82513/

Fishbein, M., y Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2), 130-132.

Gangwar, H., Date, H., y Raoot, A. D. (2014). Review on IT adoption: insights from recent technologies. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(4), 488-502. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2012-0047

Gartner (2018). Identifies Five Emerging Technology Trends That Will Blur the Lines Between Human and Machine.

Obtenido de: https://gtnr.it/34y5U6h

Gough, D., Oliver, S., y Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. Sage.

Hanafizadeh, P., Keating, B.W., y Khedmatgozar, H.R. (2014): A systematic review of Internet banking adoption.

Telemat. Inform. 31(3), 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.04.003

Khasawneh, A. M. (2008). Concepts and measurements of innovativeness: The case of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Arab Culture, Management and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 23-33. DOI:10.1504/IJACMSD.2008.020487

Legris, P., Ingham, J., y Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 40(3), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0378-7206(01)00143-4

Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., y Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and social psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3-9. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167292181001

Mishra, P. (2012). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century: Crayons are the future. TechTrends, 56(5),

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0594-0

Miller, N. & Dollar, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. Yale University Press.

Phan, K., & Daim, T. U. (2011). Exploring technology acceptance for mobile services. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 4(2), 339-360. doi:10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n2.p339-360

Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press. Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia manufacturing, 22, 960-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137

Tarhini, A., Arachchilage, N. A. G., y Abbasi, M. S. (2015). A critical review of theories and models of technology adoption and acceptance in information system research. International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), 6(4), 58-77.

Taylor, S., y Todd, P.A. (1995a). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249633

Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., y Howell, J.M. (1991). Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249443

Triandis, H. C. (1977). Cross-cultural social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727700300202

Triandis, H. C. (1980). Reflections on trends in cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 11(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022180111003

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., y Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., y Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of Information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi. org/10.2307/41410412

Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., y Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1.

Journal of modelling in management, 2(3), 251-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465660710834453

Downloads

Publicado

2022-12-28

Como Citar

García De Blanes Sebastián, M., Artonovica, A. ., & Sarmiento Guede, J. R. (2022). Why do users accept the information technology? Description and use of theories and models of their acceptance. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review Revista Internacional De Humanidades, 15(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4366

Edição

v. 15 n. 7 (2022): Monografía: "Para novos modelos de cultura, sociedade e ser humano"

Seção

Artigos de pesquisa (monográfico)

Licença

Os autores/as que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

  1. Os autores/as terão os direitos morais do trabalho e cederão para a revista os direitos comerciais.
  2. Um ano após a sua publicação, a versão do editor estará em acesso aberto no site da editora, mas a revista manterá o copyright da obra.
  3. No caso dos autores desejarem asignar uma licença aberta Creative Commons (CC), poderão a solicitar escrevendo a publishing@eagora.org.