Current Overview of Scientific Production Associated with Governance in University: A Bibliometric Analysis

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v21.5028

Palavras-chave:

Governance, University Institutions, Bibliometric Analysis

Resumo

The main objective of this research is to identify the current panorama of scientific production associated with governance in university institutions. A bibliometric analysis was developed in Scopus using R Core Team 2022-Bibliometrix and Vosviewer software. The results highlight the countries with the highest productivity in the topic of study, with the most representative authors favoring the understanding of governance. The main thematic clusters stand out. It recognizes the role of university governance and its migration to direct spaces and the transition from a face-to-face model.

Referências

Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bleiklie, I. & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and Governance of Universities. Higher Education Policy, 20.

Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2005). Orchestrating creative minds. The governance of higher education and research in four countries compared. DANS is an institute of KNAW and NWO, 02-17.

Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy? Higher education, 62(4), 503-517.

Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher education, 62(5), 665-683.

Kolsaker, A. (2008). Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: A study of English universities. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 513-525.

Leisyte, L., Enders, J., & De Boer, H. (2009). The balance between teaching and research in Dutch and English universities in the context of university governance reforms. Higher education, 58(5), 619-635.

McCowan, T. (2016). Universities and the post-2015 development agenda: an analytical framework. Higher Education, 72(4), 505-523.

Parker, L. (2011). University corporatisation: Driving redefinition. Critical perspectives on accounting, 22(4), 434-450.

Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Orviz Martínez, N., Cuervo Carabel, T. & Arce García, S., (2021). Review of scientific research in ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: a bibliometric analysis. Cuadernos de Gestión, 21(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.191189no. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.191189no.

Parker, L. D. (2002). It's been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change management. Critical perspectives on accounting, 13(5-6), 603-619.

Trakman, L. (2008). Modelling university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1-2), 63-83.

Downloads

Publicado

2023-08-02

Como Citar

Martínez, E. G. ., Sánchez Vázquez, E. ., Poveda Aguja, F. A. ., Barbosa Guerrero, . L. M. ., & Cruz Mican, E. O. . (2023). Current Overview of Scientific Production Associated with Governance in University: A Bibliometric Analysis. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review Revista Internacional De Humanidades, 21(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v21.5028

Edição

v. 21 n. 1 (2023)

Seção

Artigos de pesquisa

Licença

Os autores/as que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

  1. Os autores/as terão os direitos morais do trabalho e cederão para a revista os direitos comerciais.
  2. Um ano após a sua publicação, a versão do editor estará em acesso aberto no site da editora, mas a revista manterá o copyright da obra.
  3. No caso dos autores desejarem asignar uma licença aberta Creative Commons (CC), poderão a solicitar escrevendo a publishing@eagora.org.