Textismos como procedimientos de lenguaje inclusivo. Comunicación digital docente e implicaciones educativas

Autores

  • Francisco Núñez-Román Universidad de Sevilla
  • Coral Ivy Hunt-Gómez Universidad de Sevilla
  • Alejandro Gómez-Camacho Universidad de Sevilla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4235

Palavras-chave:

Educación, Comunicación digital, Igualdad, Textismos, Lenguaje inclusivo

Resumo

Twitter sirve plataforma a movimientos feministas como #MeeToo y potencia el uso del lenguaje inclusivo con textismos específicos que utilizan la -@ y -x como marca de género inclusivo. Se estudia el uso de docentes que trabajan con adolescentes de estas marcas en comunidades educativas virtuales en Twitter mediante minería de datos y análisis de texto. Los resultados muestran un elevado uso de -@ y -x entre los docentes en sus interacciones, lo que los convierte en modelos de la adopción de propuestas lingüísticas innovadoras por la igualdad que posteriormente pueden ser adoptadas por los adolescentes en sus comunicaciones digitales.

Referências

Alhaboby, Z. A., al-Khateeb, H. M., Barnes, J. ,& Short, E. (2016). The language is disgusting, and they refer to my disability’: the cyberharassment of disabled people. Disability & Society, 31, 1138-1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1235313

Allington, D. (2018). ‘Hitler had a valid argument against some jews’: Repertoires for the denial of antisemitism in Facebook discussion of a survey of attitudes to jews and Israel.” Discourse, Context and Media, 24, 129- 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.004

Auxland, M. (2020). Para Todes: A Case Study on Portuguese and Gender-Neutrality. Journal of Languages, Texts and Society, 4, 60-83.

Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist media studies, 16(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070.

Baker-Plummer, B., & Barker-Plummer. D. (2017). Twitter as a Feminist Resource: #YesAllWomen, Digital Platforms, and Discursive Social Change. En J. Earl, & D. A. Rohlinger (Eds.), Social Movements and Media (pp.91-118). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020170000014010

Bengoechea, M. (2011). Non-sexist Spanish policies: an attempt bound to fail? Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2010.541389

Bengoechea, M., & Simón, J. (2014). Attitudes of University Students to Some Verbal Anti-Sexist Forms. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4(1), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2014.41008

Bonnin, J. E., & Coronel, A.A. (2021). Attitudes Toward Gender-Neutral Spanish: Acceptability and Adoptability.

Frontiers in sociology, 6, 629616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.629616

Bradley, E. D. (2020). The influence of linguistic and social attitudes on grammaticality judgments of singular ‘they’. Language Sciences, 78, 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101272

Brown, A. (2018). What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech? Ethnicities, 18, 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817709846

Burch, L. (2018). You are a parasite on the productive classes’: Online disablist hate speech in austere times.

Disability and Society, 33, 392-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1411250

Cárdenas Sánchez, N. S. (2015). El género, los hombres y las mujeres. Revista Grafía, 2(1), 21-31. https://doi. org/10.26564/16926250.533

Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925701 Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2015). Engagement through microblogging: Educator professional development via Twitter. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 707-728. https://doi.org/

1080/19415257.2014.939294

Carpenter, J. P., Tur, G., & Marín, V. I. (2016). What do U.S. and Spanish pre-service teachers think about educational and professional use of Twitter? A comparative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.011

Castillo Andrés, Ó., Romero Granados, S., González Ramírez, T., & Campos Mesa, M. C. (2014). Gender equity in physical education: The use of language. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 20(3), 239-248. https://doi. org/10.1590/S1980-65742014000300001

Chenou, J.M., & Cepeda-Másmela, C. (2019). #NiUnaMenos: Data Activism from the Global South. Television & New Media, 20(4), 396-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419828995

Clark-Parsons, R. (2021). “I see you, I believe you, I stand with you”: # MeToo and the performance of networked feminist visibility. Feminist Media Studies, 21(3), 362-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.16 28797

Clark, R. (2016). Hope in a Hashtag: The Discursive Activism of #whyistayed. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 788- 804. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1138235

Comisión Europea (2021). A more inclusive and protective Europe: extending the list of EU crimes to hate speech and hate crime. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/1_1_178542_comm_eu_crimes_en.pdf

Consejo de Europa (2019). Preventing and Combating Sexism. Recommendation CM/Rec (2019)1 of the Committee of Ministers of Member States on Preventing and Combating Sexism. https://rm.coe.int/cm-rec-2019-1- on-preventing-and-combating-sexism/168094d894

De Jonge, S., & Kemp, N. (2012). Text-message abbreviations and language skills in high school and university students. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9817.2010.01466.x

Dessel, A. B., Kulick, A., Wernick, L. J., & Sullivan, D. (2017). The importance of teacher support: Differential impacts by gender and sexuality. Journal of Adolescence, 56, 36-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. adolescence.2017.02.002

Donelan, H. (2016). Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 706-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014321 Esposito, E., & Zollo, S.A. (2021). “‘How dare you call her a pig, I know several pigs who would be upset if they knew’

A multimodal critical discursive approach to online misogyny against UK MPs on YouTube.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 9, 47-75. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00053.esp

Firoozeh, N., Nazarenko, A., Alizon, F., & Daille, B. (2020). Keyword extraction: Issues and methods. Natural Language Engineering, 26(3), 259-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324919000457

Formanowicz, M., & Hansen, K. (2022). Subtle Linguistic Cues Affecting Gender In(Equality). Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41(2), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211035170

Fox, J., Cruz, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2015). Perpetuating online sexism offline: anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media. Computers in human behavior, 52, 436-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2015.06.024.

Frenda, S., Ghanem, B., Montes-y-Gómez, M., & Rosso, P. (2019). Online hate speech against women: Automatic identification of misogyny and sexism on Twitter. Journal of intelligent and fuzzy systems 36(5), 4743- 4752. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179023.

Gabriel, U., Gygax, P. M., y Kuhn, E. A. (2018). Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 844-858. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218771742

Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness Analysis: nature, metrics and techniques. En A. Taylor, & A. Marchi (Eds.) Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A critical review (pp.225-258). Routledge.

Garnham, A., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Gygax, P., & Oakhill, J. (2012). Gender representation in different languages and grammatical marking on pronouns: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics. Discourse Processes, 49(6), 481-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.688184

Ging, D., & Siapera, E. (2019) Gender hate online: Understanding the new anti-feminism. Palgrave-Macmillan. Gómez-Camacho, A., Hunt-Gómez, C. I., & Valverde-Macías, A. (2018). Textisms, texting, and spelling in Spanish.

Lingua, 201, 92-101. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.09.004

Gómez-Camacho, A., Núñez-Román, F., Hunt-Gómez, C. I., & Corujo-Vélez, M. C. (2021). Preservice Spanish teachers’ perceptions on linguistic sexism: towards the integration of norm and GFL. Language and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1981926

Guerrero Salazar, S. (2007). Esbozo de una bibliografía crítica sobre recomendaciones y guías para un uso igualitario del lenguaje administrative. En M.A. Medina Guerra (Ed.), Avanzando hacia la igualdad (pp.109-122). Diputación de Málaga-Asociación de Estudios Históricos sobre la Mujer.

Guerrero Salazar, S. (2013). Las guías de uso no sexista del lenguaje editadas en castellano por las universidades españolas (2008–2012). En R. Palomares Perraut (Coord.), Historia(s) de mujeres en homenaje a M. Teresa López Beltrán (pp.118-132). Perséfone.

Gustafsson Sendén, M., Bäck, E. A., & Lindqvist, A. (2015). Introducing a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language: the influence of time on attitudes and behavior. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 893. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00893

Gustafsson Sendén, M., Renström, E., & Lindqvist, A. (2021). Pronouns beyond the binary: The change of attitudes and use over time. Gender & Society, 35(4), 588-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211029226

Horvath, L. K., Merkel, E. F., Maass, A., & Sczesny, S. (2016). Does gender-fair language pay off? The social perception of professions from a cross-linguistic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2015.02018

Iranzo-Cabrera, M., & Gozálvez Pérez, V. (2021). Professional activism in journalism and education in gender equality through Twitter. Feminist Media Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1847158

Jiménez Rodrigo, R., Onsalo, M. L., & Traverso Cortes, J. (2011). Lenguaje no sexista y barreras a su utilización. Un estudio en el ámbito universitario. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 9(2), 174-183.

Kalinowski, S. (2020). Lenguaje inclusivo en usuarios de Twitter en Argentina: un estudio de corpus. Cuarenta Naipes, 2(3), 233-259.

Kimmons, R., Carpenter, F. P., Veletsianos, G., & Krutka, D. G. (2018). Mining social media divides: an analysis of K-12 U.S. School uses of Twitter. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.10 80/17439884.2018.1504791

Knisely, K. A. (2020). Le français non-binaire: linguistic forms used by non-binary speakers of French. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 850-876. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/flan.12500

Koeser, S., Kuhn, E. A., & Sczesny, S. (2015). Just Reading? How Gender-Fair Language Triggers Readers’ Use of Gender-Fair Forms. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(3), 343-357. https://doi. org/10.1177/0261927X14561119

Körner, A., Bleen A., Rummer, R., & Strack, F. (2022). Gender representations elicited by the gender star form.

Journal of Language and Social Psycology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221080181

Kosnick, K. (2019). The everyday poetics of gender-inclusive French: strategies for navigating the linguistic landscape. Modern & Contemporary France, 27(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2019.1588869

Li, M., Turki, N., Izaguirre, C. I., DeMahy, C., Thibodeaux, B. L., & Gage, T. (2021). Twitter as a tool for social movement: An analysis of feminist activism on social media communities. Journal of community psychology, 49(3), 854-868. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22324

Lindqvist, A., Renström, E. A, & Gustafsson Sendén, M. (2019). Reducing a Male Bias in Language? Establishing the Efficiency of Three Different Gender-Fair Language Strategies. Sex Roles, 81, 109-117. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11199-018-0974-9

Lomotey, B. A. (2015). Language reform: A critical look at its chances of success in the Spanish context. Gender and Language, 9(3), 435-460. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v9i3.18506

Lomotey, B. A. (2018). Making Spanish gender fair: A review of anti-sexist language reform attempts from a language planning perspective. Current Issues in Language Planning, 19(4), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2017.1403217

Luo, T., Freeman, C., & Stefaniak, J. (2020). “Like, comment, and share” professional development through social media in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1659-1683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09790-5

Maldonado García, M. I. (2015). Spanish ‘politically correct’ movement: Reasons for failure. Journal of Political Studies, 22(1), 237-252.

Marcelo, C., & Marcelo, P. (2021). Educational influencers on Twitter. Analysis of hashtags and relationship structure. Comunicar, 68, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-06

Medina Guerra, A. M. (2016). Las alternativas al masculino genérico y su uso en el español de España Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada, 64, 183-205. https://doi.org/10.22201/enallt.01852647p.2016.64.693

Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford University Press.

Mitton, J., Tompkins, J., & Kearns, L. L. (2021). Exploring the Impact of an anti-Homophobia and anti-Transphobia Program on a Teacher Education Program: LGBTQ+ Pre-Service Teachers Identify Benefits and Challenges. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 67(1), 32-52. https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v67i1.56915

Nagle, J. (2018). Twitter, cyber-violence, and the need for a critical social media literacy in teacher education: A review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2018.08.014

Nissen, U. K. (2002). Gender in Spanish: Tradition and innovation. En M Hellinger, & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 251-279). John Benjamins.

Nissen, U. K. (2013). Is Spanish Becoming more Gender Fair? A Historical Perspective on the Interpretation of Gender-specific and Gender-neutral Expressions. Linguistik Online, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.13092/ lo.58.241

Núñez-Román, F., Hunt-Gómez, C. I., & Gómez-Camacho, A. (2020). Gender-fair language (GFL) in the academic writing of pre-service teachers of Spanish. Current Issues in Language Planning, 25(1), 475-489. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1750253

Núñez-Román, F., Gómez-Camacho, A., Errázuriz-Cruz, M. C., & Núñez-Cortés, J.A. (2021). Pre-service Teachers’ perceptions on instant messaging and orthographic competence. Texto Livre, 14(3), e34141. https://doi. org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.34141

Núñez-Román, F., Gómez-Camacho, A., & Hunt-Gómez, C. I. (en prensa). Gender-Fair Textisms: How Educational Communities Promote Linguistics Innovation on Twitter.

Ozalp, S., Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., Liu, H., & Mostafa, M. (2020). “Antisemitism on twitter: Collective efficacy and the role of community organisations in challenging online hate speech.” Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120916850

Parra, M. L., & Serafini, L. J. (2021). “Bienvenidxs todes”: el lenguaje inclusivo desde una perspectiva crítica para las clases de español. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 8(2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/2 3247797.2021.2012739

Patev, A. J., Dunn, C. E., Hood, K. E, & Barber, J. M. (2019). College Students’ Perceptions of Gender-Inclusive Language Use Predict Attitudes Toward Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Individuals. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(3), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18815930

Pauwels, A., & Winter, A. (2006). Gender inclusivity or ‘grammar rules OK’? Linguistic prescriptivism vs linguistic discrimination in the classroom. Language and Education, 20(2), 128-140. https://doi. org/10.1080/09500780608668717

Pérez-Paredes, P. (2021). Corpus Linguistics for Education: A Guide for Research. Routledge.

Peris Vidal, M. (2013). The depoliticization of gender-based violence by use of terminology. Asparkía, 24, 176-194. Piñeiro-Otero, T., & Martínez-Rolán, X. (2021). Eso no me lo dices en la calle. Análisis del discurso del odio contra las mujeres en Twitter. Profesional de la información, 30(5), e300502. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.sep.02

Poteat, V. P., Slaatten, H., & Breivik, K. (2019). Factors associated with teachers discussing and intervening against homophobic language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2018.09.006

Real Academia Española-Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Santillana.

Saguy, A. C., & Williams, J. A. (2022). A Little Word That Means a Lot: A Reassessment of Singular They in a New Era of Gender Politics. Gender & Society, 36(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211057921

Salinas, J. C. (2020). The complexity of the “x” in Latinx: How Latinx/a/o students relate to, identify with, and understand the term Latinx. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(2), 149-168. https://doi. org/10.1177%2F1538192719900382

Sarrasin, O., Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. (2012). Sexism and attitudes toward gender-neutral language: The case of English, French, and German. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71(3), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421- 0185/a000078

Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words – And key key words. System, 25(2), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0346-251X(97)00011-0

Sills, S., Chelsea P., Karishma B., Jones, L., Calder-Dawe, O., Benton-Greig, T., & Gavey, N. (2016). Rape culture and social media: Young critics and a feminist counterpublic. Feminist Media Studies, 16(6), 935-951. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1137962

Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019). Revisiting how and why educators use Twitter: Tweet types and purposes in# Edchat. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.20 19.1611507

Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757-769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211406434

Tankovska, H. (2022a). Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2022, ranked by number of active users. Statista. https://bit.ly/3IDsBGt

Tankovska, H. (2022b). Leading countries based on number of Twitter users as of January 2022. Statista. https:// bit.ly/3uSbACJ

Tordoff, D. M., Haley, S. G., Shook, A., Kantor, A., Crouch, J. M., & Ahrens, K. (2021). “Talk about bodies”: Recommendations for using Transgender-Inclusive Language in Sex Education Curricula. Sex Roles, 84, 152-165. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11199-020-01160-y

Turner, K. H. (2010). Digitalk: A new literacy for a digital generation. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200106.

Valiente, C. (2002). An overview of research on gender in Spanish society. Gender & Society, 16(6), 767-792. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124302237887

Vervecken, D., Gygax, P. M., Gabriel, U., Guillod, M., & Hannover, B. (2015). Warm-hearted businessmen, competitive housewives? Effects of gender-fair language on adolescents’ perceptions of occupations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01437

Vidgen, B., & Yasseri, T. (2020). Detecting weak and strong islamophobic hate speech on social media. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 17, 66-78. https.//doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1702607

Winter, J., & Pauwels, A. (2006). Men staying at home looking after their children: Feminist linguistic reform and social change. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 16-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1473-4192.2006.00104.x

Wojcik, S., & Hughes, A. (2019, April 24). Sizing Up Twitters Users. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/

Xing, W., & Gao, L. (2018). Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities. Computer and Education, 126, 388-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2018.08.010

Publicado

2022-12-22

Como Citar

Núñez-Román, F. ., Hunt-Gómez, C. I., & Gómez-Camacho, A. . (2022). Textismos como procedimientos de lenguaje inclusivo. Comunicación digital docente e implicaciones educativas. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review Revista Internacional De Humanidades, 15(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4235