Textismos como procedimientos de lenguaje inclusivo. Comunicación digital docente e implicaciones educativas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4235Palavras-chave:
Educación, Comunicación digital, Igualdad, Textismos, Lenguaje inclusivoResumo
Twitter sirve plataforma a movimientos feministas como #MeeToo y potencia el uso del lenguaje inclusivo con textismos específicos que utilizan la -@ y -x como marca de género inclusivo. Se estudia el uso de docentes que trabajan con adolescentes de estas marcas en comunidades educativas virtuales en Twitter mediante minería de datos y análisis de texto. Los resultados muestran un elevado uso de -@ y -x entre los docentes en sus interacciones, lo que los convierte en modelos de la adopción de propuestas lingüísticas innovadoras por la igualdad que posteriormente pueden ser adoptadas por los adolescentes en sus comunicaciones digitales.
Referências
Alhaboby, Z. A., al-Khateeb, H. M., Barnes, J. ,& Short, E. (2016). The language is disgusting, and they refer to my disability’: the cyberharassment of disabled people. Disability & Society, 31, 1138-1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1235313
Allington, D. (2018). ‘Hitler had a valid argument against some jews’: Repertoires for the denial of antisemitism in Facebook discussion of a survey of attitudes to jews and Israel.” Discourse, Context and Media, 24, 129- 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.004
Auxland, M. (2020). Para Todes: A Case Study on Portuguese and Gender-Neutrality. Journal of Languages, Texts and Society, 4, 60-83.
Baer, H. (2016). Redoing feminism: digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist media studies, 16(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070.
Baker-Plummer, B., & Barker-Plummer. D. (2017). Twitter as a Feminist Resource: #YesAllWomen, Digital Platforms, and Discursive Social Change. En J. Earl, & D. A. Rohlinger (Eds.), Social Movements and Media (pp.91-118). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020170000014010
Bengoechea, M. (2011). Non-sexist Spanish policies: an attempt bound to fail? Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2010.541389
Bengoechea, M., & Simón, J. (2014). Attitudes of University Students to Some Verbal Anti-Sexist Forms. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4(1), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2014.41008
Bonnin, J. E., & Coronel, A.A. (2021). Attitudes Toward Gender-Neutral Spanish: Acceptability and Adoptability.
Frontiers in sociology, 6, 629616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.629616
Bradley, E. D. (2020). The influence of linguistic and social attitudes on grammaticality judgments of singular ‘they’. Language Sciences, 78, 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101272
Brown, A. (2018). What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech? Ethnicities, 18, 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817709846
Burch, L. (2018). You are a parasite on the productive classes’: Online disablist hate speech in austere times.
Disability and Society, 33, 392-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1411250
Cárdenas Sánchez, N. S. (2015). El género, los hombres y las mujeres. Revista Grafía, 2(1), 21-31. https://doi. org/10.26564/16926250.533
Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925701 Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2015). Engagement through microblogging: Educator professional development via Twitter. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 707-728. https://doi.org/
1080/19415257.2014.939294
Carpenter, J. P., Tur, G., & Marín, V. I. (2016). What do U.S. and Spanish pre-service teachers think about educational and professional use of Twitter? A comparative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.011
Castillo Andrés, Ó., Romero Granados, S., González Ramírez, T., & Campos Mesa, M. C. (2014). Gender equity in physical education: The use of language. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 20(3), 239-248. https://doi. org/10.1590/S1980-65742014000300001
Chenou, J.M., & Cepeda-Másmela, C. (2019). #NiUnaMenos: Data Activism from the Global South. Television & New Media, 20(4), 396-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419828995
Clark-Parsons, R. (2021). “I see you, I believe you, I stand with you”: # MeToo and the performance of networked feminist visibility. Feminist Media Studies, 21(3), 362-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.16 28797
Clark, R. (2016). Hope in a Hashtag: The Discursive Activism of #whyistayed. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 788- 804. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1138235
Comisión Europea (2021). A more inclusive and protective Europe: extending the list of EU crimes to hate speech and hate crime. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/1_1_178542_comm_eu_crimes_en.pdf
Consejo de Europa (2019). Preventing and Combating Sexism. Recommendation CM/Rec (2019)1 of the Committee of Ministers of Member States on Preventing and Combating Sexism. https://rm.coe.int/cm-rec-2019-1- on-preventing-and-combating-sexism/168094d894
De Jonge, S., & Kemp, N. (2012). Text-message abbreviations and language skills in high school and university students. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9817.2010.01466.x
Dessel, A. B., Kulick, A., Wernick, L. J., & Sullivan, D. (2017). The importance of teacher support: Differential impacts by gender and sexuality. Journal of Adolescence, 56, 36-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. adolescence.2017.02.002
Donelan, H. (2016). Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 706-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014321 Esposito, E., & Zollo, S.A. (2021). “‘How dare you call her a pig, I know several pigs who would be upset if they knew’
A multimodal critical discursive approach to online misogyny against UK MPs on YouTube.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 9, 47-75. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00053.esp
Firoozeh, N., Nazarenko, A., Alizon, F., & Daille, B. (2020). Keyword extraction: Issues and methods. Natural Language Engineering, 26(3), 259-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324919000457
Formanowicz, M., & Hansen, K. (2022). Subtle Linguistic Cues Affecting Gender In(Equality). Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41(2), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211035170
Fox, J., Cruz, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2015). Perpetuating online sexism offline: anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media. Computers in human behavior, 52, 436-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2015.06.024.
Frenda, S., Ghanem, B., Montes-y-Gómez, M., & Rosso, P. (2019). Online hate speech against women: Automatic identification of misogyny and sexism on Twitter. Journal of intelligent and fuzzy systems 36(5), 4743- 4752. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179023.
Gabriel, U., Gygax, P. M., y Kuhn, E. A. (2018). Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 844-858. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218771742
Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness Analysis: nature, metrics and techniques. En A. Taylor, & A. Marchi (Eds.) Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A critical review (pp.225-258). Routledge.
Garnham, A., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Gygax, P., & Oakhill, J. (2012). Gender representation in different languages and grammatical marking on pronouns: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics. Discourse Processes, 49(6), 481-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.688184
Ging, D., & Siapera, E. (2019) Gender hate online: Understanding the new anti-feminism. Palgrave-Macmillan. Gómez-Camacho, A., Hunt-Gómez, C. I., & Valverde-Macías, A. (2018). Textisms, texting, and spelling in Spanish.
Lingua, 201, 92-101. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.09.004
Gómez-Camacho, A., Núñez-Román, F., Hunt-Gómez, C. I., & Corujo-Vélez, M. C. (2021). Preservice Spanish teachers’ perceptions on linguistic sexism: towards the integration of norm and GFL. Language and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1981926
Guerrero Salazar, S. (2007). Esbozo de una bibliografía crítica sobre recomendaciones y guías para un uso igualitario del lenguaje administrative. En M.A. Medina Guerra (Ed.), Avanzando hacia la igualdad (pp.109-122). Diputación de Málaga-Asociación de Estudios Históricos sobre la Mujer.
Guerrero Salazar, S. (2013). Las guías de uso no sexista del lenguaje editadas en castellano por las universidades españolas (2008–2012). En R. Palomares Perraut (Coord.), Historia(s) de mujeres en homenaje a M. Teresa López Beltrán (pp.118-132). Perséfone.
Gustafsson Sendén, M., Bäck, E. A., & Lindqvist, A. (2015). Introducing a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language: the influence of time on attitudes and behavior. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 893. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00893
Gustafsson Sendén, M., Renström, E., & Lindqvist, A. (2021). Pronouns beyond the binary: The change of attitudes and use over time. Gender & Society, 35(4), 588-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211029226
Horvath, L. K., Merkel, E. F., Maass, A., & Sczesny, S. (2016). Does gender-fair language pay off? The social perception of professions from a cross-linguistic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2015.02018
Iranzo-Cabrera, M., & Gozálvez Pérez, V. (2021). Professional activism in journalism and education in gender equality through Twitter. Feminist Media Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1847158
Jiménez Rodrigo, R., Onsalo, M. L., & Traverso Cortes, J. (2011). Lenguaje no sexista y barreras a su utilización. Un estudio en el ámbito universitario. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 9(2), 174-183.
Kalinowski, S. (2020). Lenguaje inclusivo en usuarios de Twitter en Argentina: un estudio de corpus. Cuarenta Naipes, 2(3), 233-259.
Kimmons, R., Carpenter, F. P., Veletsianos, G., & Krutka, D. G. (2018). Mining social media divides: an analysis of K-12 U.S. School uses of Twitter. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.10 80/17439884.2018.1504791
Knisely, K. A. (2020). Le français non-binaire: linguistic forms used by non-binary speakers of French. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 850-876. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/flan.12500
Koeser, S., Kuhn, E. A., & Sczesny, S. (2015). Just Reading? How Gender-Fair Language Triggers Readers’ Use of Gender-Fair Forms. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(3), 343-357. https://doi. org/10.1177/0261927X14561119
Körner, A., Bleen A., Rummer, R., & Strack, F. (2022). Gender representations elicited by the gender star form.
Journal of Language and Social Psycology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221080181
Kosnick, K. (2019). The everyday poetics of gender-inclusive French: strategies for navigating the linguistic landscape. Modern & Contemporary France, 27(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2019.1588869
Li, M., Turki, N., Izaguirre, C. I., DeMahy, C., Thibodeaux, B. L., & Gage, T. (2021). Twitter as a tool for social movement: An analysis of feminist activism on social media communities. Journal of community psychology, 49(3), 854-868. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22324
Lindqvist, A., Renström, E. A, & Gustafsson Sendén, M. (2019). Reducing a Male Bias in Language? Establishing the Efficiency of Three Different Gender-Fair Language Strategies. Sex Roles, 81, 109-117. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11199-018-0974-9
Lomotey, B. A. (2015). Language reform: A critical look at its chances of success in the Spanish context. Gender and Language, 9(3), 435-460. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v9i3.18506
Lomotey, B. A. (2018). Making Spanish gender fair: A review of anti-sexist language reform attempts from a language planning perspective. Current Issues in Language Planning, 19(4), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2017.1403217
Luo, T., Freeman, C., & Stefaniak, J. (2020). “Like, comment, and share” professional development through social media in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1659-1683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09790-5
Maldonado García, M. I. (2015). Spanish ‘politically correct’ movement: Reasons for failure. Journal of Political Studies, 22(1), 237-252.
Marcelo, C., & Marcelo, P. (2021). Educational influencers on Twitter. Analysis of hashtags and relationship structure. Comunicar, 68, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-06
Medina Guerra, A. M. (2016). Las alternativas al masculino genérico y su uso en el español de España Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada, 64, 183-205. https://doi.org/10.22201/enallt.01852647p.2016.64.693
Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford University Press.
Mitton, J., Tompkins, J., & Kearns, L. L. (2021). Exploring the Impact of an anti-Homophobia and anti-Transphobia Program on a Teacher Education Program: LGBTQ+ Pre-Service Teachers Identify Benefits and Challenges. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 67(1), 32-52. https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v67i1.56915
Nagle, J. (2018). Twitter, cyber-violence, and the need for a critical social media literacy in teacher education: A review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2018.08.014
Nissen, U. K. (2002). Gender in Spanish: Tradition and innovation. En M Hellinger, & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (pp. 251-279). John Benjamins.
Nissen, U. K. (2013). Is Spanish Becoming more Gender Fair? A Historical Perspective on the Interpretation of Gender-specific and Gender-neutral Expressions. Linguistik Online, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.13092/ lo.58.241
Núñez-Román, F., Hunt-Gómez, C. I., & Gómez-Camacho, A. (2020). Gender-fair language (GFL) in the academic writing of pre-service teachers of Spanish. Current Issues in Language Planning, 25(1), 475-489. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1750253
Núñez-Román, F., Gómez-Camacho, A., Errázuriz-Cruz, M. C., & Núñez-Cortés, J.A. (2021). Pre-service Teachers’ perceptions on instant messaging and orthographic competence. Texto Livre, 14(3), e34141. https://doi. org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.34141
Núñez-Román, F., Gómez-Camacho, A., & Hunt-Gómez, C. I. (en prensa). Gender-Fair Textisms: How Educational Communities Promote Linguistics Innovation on Twitter.
Ozalp, S., Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., Liu, H., & Mostafa, M. (2020). “Antisemitism on twitter: Collective efficacy and the role of community organisations in challenging online hate speech.” Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120916850
Parra, M. L., & Serafini, L. J. (2021). “Bienvenidxs todes”: el lenguaje inclusivo desde una perspectiva crítica para las clases de español. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 8(2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/2 3247797.2021.2012739
Patev, A. J., Dunn, C. E., Hood, K. E, & Barber, J. M. (2019). College Students’ Perceptions of Gender-Inclusive Language Use Predict Attitudes Toward Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Individuals. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(3), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18815930
Pauwels, A., & Winter, A. (2006). Gender inclusivity or ‘grammar rules OK’? Linguistic prescriptivism vs linguistic discrimination in the classroom. Language and Education, 20(2), 128-140. https://doi. org/10.1080/09500780608668717
Pérez-Paredes, P. (2021). Corpus Linguistics for Education: A Guide for Research. Routledge.
Peris Vidal, M. (2013). The depoliticization of gender-based violence by use of terminology. Asparkía, 24, 176-194. Piñeiro-Otero, T., & Martínez-Rolán, X. (2021). Eso no me lo dices en la calle. Análisis del discurso del odio contra las mujeres en Twitter. Profesional de la información, 30(5), e300502. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.sep.02
Poteat, V. P., Slaatten, H., & Breivik, K. (2019). Factors associated with teachers discussing and intervening against homophobic language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2018.09.006
Real Academia Española-Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Santillana.
Saguy, A. C., & Williams, J. A. (2022). A Little Word That Means a Lot: A Reassessment of Singular They in a New Era of Gender Politics. Gender & Society, 36(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211057921
Salinas, J. C. (2020). The complexity of the “x” in Latinx: How Latinx/a/o students relate to, identify with, and understand the term Latinx. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(2), 149-168. https://doi. org/10.1177%2F1538192719900382
Sarrasin, O., Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. (2012). Sexism and attitudes toward gender-neutral language: The case of English, French, and German. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71(3), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421- 0185/a000078
Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words – And key key words. System, 25(2), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0346-251X(97)00011-0
Sills, S., Chelsea P., Karishma B., Jones, L., Calder-Dawe, O., Benton-Greig, T., & Gavey, N. (2016). Rape culture and social media: Young critics and a feminist counterpublic. Feminist Media Studies, 16(6), 935-951. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1137962
Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019). Revisiting how and why educators use Twitter: Tweet types and purposes in# Edchat. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.20 19.1611507
Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757-769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211406434
Tankovska, H. (2022a). Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2022, ranked by number of active users. Statista. https://bit.ly/3IDsBGt
Tankovska, H. (2022b). Leading countries based on number of Twitter users as of January 2022. Statista. https:// bit.ly/3uSbACJ
Tordoff, D. M., Haley, S. G., Shook, A., Kantor, A., Crouch, J. M., & Ahrens, K. (2021). “Talk about bodies”: Recommendations for using Transgender-Inclusive Language in Sex Education Curricula. Sex Roles, 84, 152-165. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11199-020-01160-y
Turner, K. H. (2010). Digitalk: A new literacy for a digital generation. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200106.
Valiente, C. (2002). An overview of research on gender in Spanish society. Gender & Society, 16(6), 767-792. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124302237887
Vervecken, D., Gygax, P. M., Gabriel, U., Guillod, M., & Hannover, B. (2015). Warm-hearted businessmen, competitive housewives? Effects of gender-fair language on adolescents’ perceptions of occupations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01437
Vidgen, B., & Yasseri, T. (2020). Detecting weak and strong islamophobic hate speech on social media. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 17, 66-78. https.//doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1702607
Winter, J., & Pauwels, A. (2006). Men staying at home looking after their children: Feminist linguistic reform and social change. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 16-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1473-4192.2006.00104.x
Wojcik, S., & Hughes, A. (2019, April 24). Sizing Up Twitters Users. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/
Xing, W., & Gao, L. (2018). Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities. Computer and Education, 126, 388-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2018.08.010
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os autores/as que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Os autores/as terão os direitos morais do trabalho e cederão para a revista os direitos comerciais.
- Um ano após a sua publicação, a versão do editor estará em acesso aberto no site da editora, mas a revista manterá o copyright da obra.
- No caso dos autores desejarem asignar uma licença aberta Creative Commons (CC), poderão a solicitar escrevendo a publishing@eagora.org.
