Supporting Volitive Strategies and Improving the Experience of Distance Students

Authors

  • Silvia Verónica Valdivia Yábar Universidad Nacional del Altiplano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.3874

Keywords:

Distance Learning, Learning Experience, Self-regulation, Motivation, Volitional Strategies, Tangible Design, Students

Abstract

The objective of the study was to explore the potential of tangible design to support volition in distance education. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six students with the aim of focusing on their distance learning experience. The interpretive phenomenological analysis of the interviews evidenced the difficulties that can be mitigated through by implementing volitional strategies such as the structuring time and environment, managing emotions and motivation, and seeking social support. Five tangible objects were proposed to meet the needs of the students: the reward tube, the album of victories, the emotional thermometer, the learning cap and the guardian of time.

References

Achtziger, A. y Gollwitzer, P. M. (2018). Motivation and volition in the course of action. En J. Heckhausen y H. Heckhausen (Eds.). Motivation and Action (pp. 485-527). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4_12

Atkinson, W. (2016). El poder de la voluntad. Greenbooks Editore.

Baumeister, R. F. y Vohs, K. D. (2018). Strength model of self-regulation as limited resource: Assessment, controversies, update. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 67-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.04.001

Berrebi-Hoffmann, I., Bureau, M. C. y Lallement, M. (2018). Makers. Enquête sur les laboratoires du changement social. Seuil.

Borges-Solano, L. Y. (2015). El compromiso escolar de los estudiantes en República Dominicana: validación de su medida y de las variables de su red nomológica [tesis de doctorado, Universitat de València]. Repositorio Institucional https://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/51020

Boud, D. y Prosser, M. (2014). Appraising new technologies for learning: A framework for development. Educational Media International, 39(3–4), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980210166026

Cirillo, F. (2018). The pomodoro technique: The life-Changing time-management System. Random House.

Cosnefroy, L. (2010). Getting to work and keeping on working: Troubles with self-regulation. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 170, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.1388

De Smedt, T. y Daelemans, W. (2012). Pattern for Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 2063–2067. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2188385.2343710

Deimann, M. y Bastiaens, T. (2010). The role of volition in distance education: An exploration of its capacities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.778

Dornyei, Z. y Otto, I. (2007). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 4, 43–69.

Efklides, A. (2014). How does metacognition contribute to the regulation of learning? An integrative approach. Psihologijske Topics, 23(1), 1–30.

Fasse, L., Sultan, S. y Flahault, C. (2014). Le deuil, des signes à l’expérience. Réflexions sur la norme et le vécu de la personne endeuillée à l’heure de la classification du deuil compliqué. L’Evolution Psychiatrique, 79(2), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evopsy.2013.03.002

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M. y Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Gable, S. L. y Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103

Gaggioli, A., Riva, G., Peters, D. y Calvo, R. A. (2017). Positive technology, computing, and design: Shaping a future in which technology promotes psychological well-being. En Emotions and affect in human factors and human–computer interaction (pp. 477–502). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801851-4.00018-5

Hassenzahl, M. y Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331

Heckhausen, J. (2018). Motivation and action: Introduction and Overvies. En J. Heckhausen y H. Heckhausen (Eds.). Motivation and Action (pp. 1-9). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499821

Houart, M. (2017). L’apprentissage autorégulé : quand la métacognition orchestre motivation, volition et cognition. Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’enseignement Supérieur, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ripes.1246

Houart, M., Bachy, S., Dony, S., Hauzeur, D., Lambert, I., Poncin, C. y Slosse, P. (2019). La volition, entre motivation et cognition : quelle place dans la pratique des étudiants, quels liens avec la motivation et la cognition? Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’enseignement Supérieur, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/ripes.2061

Kaufmann, R. y Vallade, J. I. (2020). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670

Klanten, R., Ehmann, S. y Hübner, M. (2009). Tangible : High Touch Visuals. Gestalten.

Kuhl, J. (2012). Action Control: The maintenance of motivational states. En F. Halisch y J. Kuhl (Eds.). Motivation, intention, and volition (pp. 279-291). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70967-8_19

Massar, S. A. A., Csathó, Á. y Van der Linden, D. (2018). Quantifying the motivational effects of cognitive fatigue through effort-based decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(MAY), 843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00843

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-004-0006-X

Schueller, S. M. y Seligman, M. E. (2010). Pursuit of pleasure, engagement, and meaning: Relationships to subjective and objective measures of well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439761003794130

Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. y Otterpohl, N. (2018). Motivation at School and University. En J. Heckhausen y H. Heckhausen (Eds.). Motivation and Action. (pp. 783-817) Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4_18

Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E. y Forlizzi, J. (2010). An Analysis and Critique of Research throungh Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. En Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 310–319). https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858228

Downloads

Published

2022-12-05

How to Cite

Valdivia Yábar, S. V. . (2022). Supporting Volitive Strategies and Improving the Experience of Distance Students. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review Revista Internacional De Humanidades, 11(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.3874

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 5 (2022): Monograph: "Communicating Current Teaching Approaches"

Section

Research Articles (Special Issue)

License

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
  2. After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
  3. In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org