The challenges of the teacher in the university of the 21st century
Dealing with digital competence and student engagement
Keywords:
Digital Competence, Teachers, Students, Online Classes, Challenges, Pedagogy, ConnectivityAbstract
For a long time, the teacher has been subject not only to an ad hoc learning of digital skills but also to prepare to develop skills in their students in the different modalities: face-to-face, online, hybrid. This chapter exposes some challenges for the teacher, as well as the relationship of connectivism as a form of learning. The self-perception of the students of various courses about the know-how of the teacher in virtual classes will be exposed. As main conclusions, greater management by the teacher in digital competence is necessary, as well as the management of strategies to dynamize the sessions.
References
Abanades, M. (2019). Las ecologías del aprendizaje en el escenario de la educación superior. Contenidos de Vanguardia en el EEES. Ediciones Pirámide. Grupo Anaya.
Anderson, H. H., & Brewer, H. M. (1945). Studies of Teachers‘ Classroom Personalities: Dominative and Socially Integrative Behavior of Kindergarten Teachers.... I. Stanford University Press.
Beresaluce, R., Peiró, S., & Ramos, C. (2014). El profesor como guía-orientador. Un modelo docente. XII Jornades de Xarxes d‘Investigació en Docència Universitària.
Boice, R. (1992). Lessons learned about mentoring. New directions for teaching and learning, 50, 51-61.
Campbell, R. J., & Neill, S. R. S. J. (1994). Primary teachers at work. Psychology Press.
Castro, M., Arellano, M., Núñez, J., Aguila, C., & Castro, G. (2020). Características del docente virtual: retos de la universidad peruana en el contexto de una pandemia. Revista Inclusiones, 119-136.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Coll, C. (2013). La educación formal en la nueva ecología del aprendizaje: tendencias, retos y agenda de investigación. Aprendizaje y educación en la sociedad digital, 156-170.
Feldman, K. A. (1976). The superior college teacher from the students‘ view. Research in Higher Education, 5(3), 243-288.
Fox, R. F. (1980). Treatment of writing apprehension and its effects on composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 14(1), 39-49.
Giesbrech, Natalie. 2007. Connectivism: Teaching and learning. Retrieved March 26, 2008, from http://design.test.olt.ubc.ca/Connectivism:_Teaching_and_Learning
Holguín, R. M. V. (2020). Retos de las universidades latinoamericanas en la educación virtual. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, (59), 1-3.
Knight, P.T. (2005). El profesorado de Educación Superior. Formación para la excelencia. Ed. Narcea.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. The Journal of social psychology, 10(2), 269-299.
McDermott, R. P. (1977). Kids make sense: An ethnographic account of the interactional management of success and failure in one first-grade classroom. Department of Anthropology, Stanford University
Robinson, K (2015). Escuelas Creativas. Ed. Grijalbo.
Sandín, E. (2003). Investigación cualitativa en educación. Fundamentos y tradiciones. McGraw Hill.
Siemens, G. (2004). Conectivismo: Una teoría de aprendizaje para la era digital. Disponible en: http://www.fce.ues.edu.sv/uploads/pdf/siemens-2004-conectivismo.pdf.Spencer, Bruce. 2004. On-Line adult learning. In Griff Foley (ed.), Dimensions of adult learning: Adult education and training in a global era (pp.182-200). Berkshire: Open University Press
Martínez-Salanova, E. (2002). Comunicar, ciencia y experiencia. Aularia: Revista Digital de Educomunicación. 2, 4-8.
Peiró, S. (1999). Modelos teoréticos de educación. Interpretación antropológica. ECU.
Weber, M. (1944). Economía y sociedad. FCE.
