Dilthey´s contribution to hermeneutics and investigative psychology

Authors

  • Rolly Guillermo Rivas Huaman Universidad Nacional de Educación Enrique Guzmán y Valle

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4072

Keywords:

Philosophy of the spirit, Hermeneutics, History, Psychological research, Psychology

Abstract

Psychology today is an indisputable science, but it was not always so. Philosophers and scientists of the past considered that the study of the subjectivity of man was not science; in this frame appears the figure of the philosopher Wilhelm Dilthey. Since the generalization of the ideas of Auguste Comte, the argument of the defenders of axiomatic, deterministic and positivist truth was that the study of human subjectivity is impossible and unreliable, since it is not verifiable and much less measurable. Dilthey goes beyond Schleiermacher and proposes a Hermeneutics capable of interpreting human behavior.

References

Arzensek, L. (2018). friedrich schleiermacher´s hermeneutical aspects of translation. Phainomena, 27(104–105), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.32022/PHI27.2018.104-105.14

Berner, C., & Ramírez, D. A. R. (2021). La actitud hermenéutica. Ideas y Valores, 70(176), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v70.n176.95039

Chaves-Montero, A., & Gadea Aiello, W. F. (2018). La relación sujeto-objeto en la concepción kantiana de la ciencia. Sophía, 25, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n25.2018.03

Fernández, F. (2004). Wilhelm Dilthey y las categorías de la vida: La metamorfosis historicista del apriorismo kantiano | Anuario Filosófico. Anuario Filosófico, 37(3), 869–883. https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/anuario-filosofico/article/view/29362

García Prado, J. (1947). Apuntes para la historia de La Rioja. In Berceo (Pro & Cont, Issue 4). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/61014.pdf%5Cnhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/extart?codigo=61014

Hidalgo, Y. D. T., & Cruz, Y. L. (2015). La hermenéutica en el pensamiento de Wilhelm Dilthey. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, 11(1), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.31977/GRIRFI.V11I1.625

Hubig, C., & Radinković, Ž. (2021). Understanding opens a wide realm of possibilities…. Humanities and Education in a Functionalized World. Filozofija i Drustvo, 32(4), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2104629H

Iovchuk, M., & Azzati, C. (1978). Historia de la filosofía (Progreso). https://www.filosofia.org/aut/004/hf101.pdf

Khamitov, R. M. (2018). The problem of knowledge of history in Wilhelm Dilthey’s philosophy. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Filosofiya, Sotsiologiya, Politologiya, 44, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/44/13

Liashenko, I. (2018). Wilhelm Dilthey: Understanding the Human World. Philosophy and Cosmology, 20, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.29202/PHIL-COSM/20/16

Lorenzo, L. M. (2011). Vida, historia y psicología en wilhelm dilthey. Topicos, 21. https://doi.org/10.14409/TOPICOS.V0I21.7537

Maas, W. P. (2010). Hermenêutica e anti-hermenêutica: Friedrich Schlegel e Schleiermacher. Pandaemonium Germanicum, 15, 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1982-88372010000100003

Mancilla, M. (2022). The art of understanding in friedrich schleiermacher hermeneutics. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(9), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110864

Mantas España, P. (2019). Why a history of medieval philosophy? John Marenbon and the untimely thesis. Anuario Filosofico, 52(2), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.15581/009.52.2.005

Manzo, S. (2016). Empirismo y filosofía experimental. Las límitaciones del relato estándar de la filosofía moderna a la luz de la historiografía francesa del siglo XIX (J.-M. Degérando). Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de La Ciencia, 16(32). https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/414/41449296002.pdf

Martinelli, R. (2018). Defining human sciences: Theodor Waitz’s influence on Dilthey. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26(3), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2017.1394816

Martínez Migueles, M. (2004). Ciencia y arte en la metodología cualitativa (Trillas (ed.); primera ed).

Molina, J. (2006). Dilthey y la psicologí. Persona, 0(009), 95. https://doi.org/10.26439/persona2006.n009.904

Smiljanić, D. (2018). New Phenomenology – A step forward on the path towards reconciliation between philosophy of life and phenomenology? Synthesis Philosophica, 33(2), 475–488. https://doi.org/10.21464/SP33210

Vallejos, M. Á. G. (2020). Kant and the human condition. Ideas y Valores, 69(173), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.15446/IDEASYVALORES.V69N173.64411

Van, A. (2019). Multifarious facets in the thinking of the elusive Friedrich Schleiermacher. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 75, 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i4.5509

Zambrana, R. (2012). El legado de Hegel. Universitas Philosophica, 29(59), 15–31. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=409534426002

Downloads

Published

2022-12-19

How to Cite

Rivas Huaman, R. G. . (2022). Dilthey´s contribution to hermeneutics and investigative psychology. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review Revista Internacional De Humanidades, 13(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4072

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 5 (2022): Monograph: "Trends and Approaches in Current Philosophy"

Section

Research Articles (Special Issue)

License

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
  2. After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
  3. In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org